News

Key takeaways

• SpaceX is not just a rocket company. Its investment story now also runs through Starlink, satellites and artificial intelligence.

• Starlink turns SpaceX’s launch advantage into recurring broadband revenue, while xAI adds a more ambitious data and artificial intelligence angle to the story.

• The opportunity is large, but valuation, execution, xAI spending and governance risks make discipline essential.

SpaceX has spent years making rocket launches look almost routine. That is a strange sentence, but it is also the point. The company has turned one of the hardest jobs in engineering into something closer to an industrial process.

Now public investors get their turn to decide what that is worth. SpaceX priced its initial public offering at 135 USD per share, raising 75 billion USD and valuing the company at around 1.77 trillion USD. The shares are due to begin trading on Nasdaq under the ticker SPCX on 12 June 2026.

For investors, the question is not whether rockets are exciting. They are. The question is whether SpaceX can turn a powerful ecosystem into durable profits, without asking shareholders to pay for Mars before Earth pays the bills.

The flywheel behind the fireworks

SpaceX is best known for rockets, especially Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy and Starship. Its core advantage is reuse. If a rocket can fly again, launch costs can fall, launch frequency can rise and customers get more access to orbit. In short, SpaceX is trying to make space transport more like air freight and less like throwing away a jumbo jet after every trip.

That matters because rockets are the first layer of the ecosystem. They carry satellites into space. Those satellites support Starlink, the company’s fast broadband network. Starlink then creates recurring revenue from households, businesses, ships, aircraft and remote users that need internet access where fibre cables are unavailable, unreliable or too expensive to install.

This is the strongest part of the current story. Starlink has scale, global reach and a direct link to SpaceX’s launch advantage. SpaceX can launch its own satellites, upgrade them faster and build a network that competitors may struggle to match. The rocket business feeds the satellite business. The satellite business gives more reason to launch rockets. That is the flywheel.

Then comes artificial intelligence, through xAI. This part of the story is more ambitious and less proven. SpaceX wants to connect rockets, satellites, computing and AI models into a broader infrastructure platform. In theory, this could make SpaceX more than a space company. It could become a backbone for communications, data and computing. In practice, AI is expensive, competitive and still far from easy money. The moat may be deep, but building it will not be cheap.

The index effect: another booster, not the engine

SpaceX’s size means index inclusion could become part of the story, not because it changes the business, but because it may create automatic demand from passive funds. Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) may be able to add very large IPOs relatively quickly, while Nasdaq has adjusted its Nasdaq 100 rules to make room for large new listings. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500) is stricter, as newly listed companies usually need at least 12 months of trading history before they can be considered.

For investors, this matters, but only up to a point. Index demand can support the share price, especially after a large IPO. Yet it does not launch satellites, lower rocket costs or make Starlink more profitable. SpaceX still has to prove that its ecosystem can turn engineering strength into durable cash flow. Passive flows may add thrust, but the engine remains the business.

For investors who prefer oxygen tanks

Not every investor needs to own SpaceX directly. Some may want exposure to the broader space, satellite, aerospace and defence supply chain through exchange-traded funds (ETFs), such as the ARK Space & Defence Innovation ETF, the iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF, or the VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF. For investors who want to explore the theme more broadly, our Space Economy shortlist can also be a useful source of inspiration for further research.

These funds are not all the same. Some focus more on space technology. Others are broader aerospace and defence funds, with exposure to aircraft, suppliers, defence contractors and launch-related companies. They may not own SpaceX immediately, and some investors outside the United States may face local access rules. The dull homework matters: check holdings, fees, liquidity and whether the fund’s rules allow new IPOs.

Fireworks, fuel and gravity

The opportunity is clear. SpaceX has rare engineering capability, a leading launch position, a scaled satellite network and a brand that few industrial companies can match. If Starlink keeps growing and Starship works at scale, SpaceX could reshape space access, broadband and perhaps parts of AI infrastructure.

The risks are just as real. Valuation is the first. A 1.77 trillion USD market value requires very large future profits. The second is execution. Starship, satellite upgrades and AI infrastructure all need heavy investment. Delays can be costly. The third is governance. Elon Musk remains central to the story, which can be a strength, but also a concentration risk.

Early warning signs include slower Starlink subscriber growth, launch failures that delay capacity, rising capital spending without clearer profits, regulatory pushback, or index inclusion creating a short-term price spike that later fades. IPOs often come with fireworks. Investing is more about checking whether the launch vehicle has enough fuel after the show.

Investor playbook

• Separate admiration from allocation. Great companies can still be risky investments at demanding prices.

• Watch first quarterly results for Starlink growth, cash flow, capital spending and AI losses.

• Compare single-stock exposure with ETF exposure before deciding how much concentration feels sensible.

• Treat index inclusion as a demand event, not proof of fair value.

Back to Earth, with eyes on the stars

SpaceX’s IPO is a rare market moment because it wraps several big stories into one stock: rockets, satellites, broadband and artificial intelligence. That is why the excitement is understandable. It is also why discipline matters.

The best investors do not need to be first through the door. They need to know what they own, why they own it and what would prove the thesis wrong. SpaceX may be building the infrastructure for a more connected future, but investors still face an old-fashioned task: pay a sensible price for future cash flows, not just for a spectacular rocket launch.

The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.

Key points:

• Quantum computing is entering a new phase of acceleration, with a sharp increase in both private and public investment since 2025.
• Despite this influx of capital, the sector remains largely pre-commercial. Company revenues are still limited, and a significant share of market value is now driven by expectations of future growth rather than current performance.
• The technological landscape is still highly open. Several competing approaches coexist, with no dominant standard having yet emerged, keeping uncertainty high regarding tomorrow’s winners.
• Quantum technology has become a strategic priority for governments, on par with semiconductors and artificial intelligence. It is directly linked to issues of cybersecurity, defense, and technological sovereignty.

Understanding the essentials

A classical computer, like the one on your desk, your phone, or Amazon’s servers, processes bits. Each bit is either 0 or 1: on or off, black or white. All modern computing is built on this binary logic. A quantum computer, on the other hand, uses qubits. A qubit can be both 0 and 1 at the same time: this is what is known as superposition. To this is added entanglement: two qubits can become linked in such a way that any action on one instantly affects the other, regardless of the distance between them. Imagine a gigantic maze with millions of paths. A classical computer tests them one by one. A quantum computer explores them all in parallel. This is not just “faster”,  it is a fundamental shift in the nature of computation! In practical terms, quantum computing could make it possible to solve extremely complex problems much faster than today’s computers. Where the most powerful supercomputers would need thousands or even millions of years, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could find a solution in just a few hours. The potential applications are vast: discovering new drugs, improving batteries, optimizing transport networks, strengthening cybersecurity, or better analyzing financial risk.

The major capital influx: private money enters the game

Beyond the sheer amounts involved, what is changing most is the structure of funding. The sector, long supported by public research institutions and laboratories, is now heavily dependent on private investors. In 2025, nearly 97% of funding for quantum startups came from private sources, compared with 67% a year earlier. At the same time, financial markets are playing an increasingly important role in funding the sector. A significant share of capital now flows through IPOs, mergers and acquisitions, and public market fundraising. Quantum is thus gradually moving beyond the venture capital ecosystem alone and entering the realm of traditional financial markets. This dynamic is accompanied by a strong concentration of investment. The ten largest deals in 2025 alone accounted for around 60% of global funding. The sector is therefore beginning to structure itself around a handful of players identified as leaders, while the rest of the ecosystem remains highly fragmented.

This rise of private-sector dominance is also being supported by governments. In the United States, more than $2 billion in public funding has been announced under the CHIPS and Science Act, particularly in support of players such as IBM and IonQ. As a result, the combination of private capital, financial markets, and public support has significantly accelerated interest in the sector. Shares in the S&P Kensho Quantum Computing index have risen by 60% since January 2026, far outperforming the Nasdaq-100 (+21%).

Quantum becomes a global strategic priority

1) Communication security (the “Q-Day” scenario) Today, most digital systems rely on encryption mechanisms to protect data: banks, messaging services, public administrations, and defense systems. A sufficiently advanced quantum computer could eventually weaken some of these protections. This is sometimes referred to as “Q-Day”, a moment when certain cryptographic systems would no longer be secure enough. Governments are already preparing for this scenario by developing new security standards designed to withstand the quantum era. 2) A military and technological advantage Quantum technology is not limited to computing; it also extends to measurement and sensing. It could enable more precise navigation systems independent of GPS, useful in military or underwater environments. It also opens the door to sensors capable of detecting extremely weak signals or variations that are currently invisible. 3) Control of the key technologies of the future Quantum computing could also transform entire sectors of the economy: chemistry, energy, materials, and healthcare. For example, it could make it possible to simulate molecules far more accurately, accelerate the discovery of new materials, or optimize highly complex industrial processes. The entity that masters these tools could therefore gain a significant lead in strategic industries. This importance explains why all major powers are investing heavily. According to McKinsey & Company, more than $55 billion in public investments have already been announced worldwide to support the development of quantum technologies.

Europe holds a strong position in research, but it is still trying to turn this scientific lead into industrial leadership.

Where quantum truly creates value

Pharmaceuticals Quantum computing could transform drug discovery by enabling more precise simulation of molecular behavior. The goal is to reduce both the time and cost of developing new treatments, which are currently often very long and expensive processes. Companies such as AstraZeneca are already collaborating with IonQ and NVIDIA on hybrid approaches combining classical and quantum computing. Finance In finance, quantum computing is being explored to optimize portfolios, improve risk management, and accelerate certain complex market-related calculations. HSBC and IBM have already tested early applications in algorithmic trading, while JPMorgan is working with Quantinuum on use cases related to cryptography and secure random number generation. Chemistry & materials Quantum computing could help design new materials, optimize batteries, and improve industrial processes, particularly in the context of the energy transition. Companies such as BASF are already exploring these applications with quantum players like D-Wave. Logistics & transport Quantum computing could enable the optimization of extremely complex logistics problems: routing, supply chains, and real-time flow management. IonQ, for example, is working with companies such as Einride on use cases related to advanced logistics and autonomous transport systems.

How to invest in quantum

Indirect exposure through Big Tech IBM, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are all heavily involved in quantum computing while also benefiting from highly diversified business models.

This setup provides exposure to quantum advancements while remaining backed by established companies with multiple revenue streams. Quantum-themed ETFs The Defiance Quantum ETF is the best known. It has gained +78% over the past 12 months and +40% since January 2026. Other ETFs are also available from iShares and VanEck. These funds provide automatic diversification across companies in the sector. Listed pure players Specialized companies such as IonQ, D-Wave, and Rigetti offer direct exposure to this technology, but with a very high level of risk and significant volatility. This type of investment can experience extreme moves, with sharp rallies following technological breakthroughs, but also severe corrections in the event of delays or disappointments.

Key risks to understand

Conclusion